MobDojoStart learning free

Mobile Malware · Real-World Cases · Lesson 2 of 5

Joker & Billing Fraud

How one malware family billed phone accounts and kept slipping back into Play.

12 min60 XPLab in Pro

Charges on the phone bill

In Android App Security you met Bread, also called Joker, as a classic Play Store dropper. This lesson is about how it actually made money. Google's Android security team described it in detail in a January 2020 post, saying it had tracked the family since early 2017.

Joker's business was billing fraud: signing victims up for paid services and charging them through their mobile carrier, so the cost lands on the phone bill instead of a card. Google described two kinds.

Google's key point was that these checks verify the device, not the person. The carrier can tell the request came from your phone, but nothing proves you meant it. Joker automated every step: it loaded the payment page out of sight, pressed the buttons, read the confirmation code from the incoming text, and typed it in. Microsoft's threat intelligence team, writing about toll fraud in June 2022, added that such apps switch off Wi-Fi or force their traffic over mobile data, and can dismiss the carrier's "you've subscribed" notification so the victim never sees it.

The charges are usually small and recurring. One disclosure screen Google translated, from a campaign aimed at Thai carriers, offered a service "from 9 Baht / day", under 30 US cents a day at the time. That's the point: small charges hide in a bill until they add up over months. Google also found the cancellation phone numbers shown were fake, and billing started even if the user never tapped Confirm.

For a victim, the practical checks are the phone bill and the carrier's list of premium or third-party subscriptions, which most carriers let you view and block.

Why it kept getting back into Play

Google said Play Protect had detected and removed about 1,700 unique Bread apps from the Play Store before anyone downloaded them. At peak times it saw up to 23 different Bread apps submitted to Play in a single day. Google's summary: sheer volume was the group's preferred approach.

Google described several ways the apps tried to slip through review:

Google's responses included new Play policies restricting which apps may use SMS permissions, which Google said pushed Joker away from SMS fraud, and treating updates exactly like new apps during analysis, which targets versioning.

The family adapted again. Kaspersky reported in May 2022 that Joker apps were often real apps with fraud code added, which stayed dormant until the app went live, and then downloaded the fraud part in up to four stages. Where an app had no believable reason to read texts, it asked for notification access instead, because notifications show the code. Kaspersky said trojanized apps were removed daily but new ones kept appearing, and listed other subscription families too.

How common is this today? Recent public reporting names Joker less often, but subscription fraud as a category keeps showing up in vendor reports. Treat any claim about its current scale as an estimate from the specific source.

Test yourself

Can you answer these?

  1. According to Google's analysis, what weakness in carrier billing did Joker take advantage of?
  2. A Play reviewer outside the target countries installs a new Bread app on a test phone. It shows wallpapers and nothing else suspicious happens. Which technique from Google's report best explains this?

Answer them in the app to earn 60 XP (Pro).

Answer in the app